View Full Version : ENRON
TEARZ
01-23-2002, 03:59 AM
i haven't given up on intelligent discussion in this forum.
man, as if i needed another reason to prove that mr. bush is one slimey motherfucker.
god damn. this is some truly scandalous shit. i just feel bad for those people who held stock in enron and the enron employees who were not complicit in the whole fiasco. that's some bullshit.
many of enron's top executives made over 100 million dollars each in the selling of their personal stock in the company while employees were restricted from selling their stock and received company stock in place of a standard 401K.
if bush were a democrat, the republican mafia would have already lynched him after a torturous media witch hunt. peep his connections with enron, from this robert scheer article from thenation.com :
One of the major falsehoods being bandied about by apologists for the Bush Administration is that while Enron may have bankrolled much of the President's political career it got nothing for those bucks once George W. occupied the White House.
That is nonsense.
The Administration's energy program, developed by Vice President Dick Cheney in secret meetings--six of them with Enron officials--could have been written by lobbyists for the now failed company. At the behest of Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Los Angeles), the minority staff of the House Committee on Government Reform has prepared a devastating analysis of 17 major concessions made to Enron that gave Kenneth L. Lay, Bush's intimate friend and Enron chief executive, just about everything he wanted. The report concluded that "it is unlikely that any other corporation in America stood to gain as much from the White House plan as Enron."
Those Bush Administration concessions to Enron included finishing the job of deregulating the electricity market begun by Bush's father. The senior Bush's actions had paved the way for the company's meteoric growth.
George W.'s energy plan also made it even easier for Enron to sell energy derivatives in the commodity market and pursue other financial shenanigans that had been a major source of profit. The unregulated selling of energy derivatives, an Enron specialty, was celebrated in the Bush energy plan as "sophisticated and customizable." We now know that practice was so sophisticated that it was the major source of Enron's paper profits.
Oddly, given that Republicans are presumed to favor leaving power with the states, the Bush energy plan emphasized increased federal power over utility pipelines that forced local utilities to carry Enron's product. This was an expansion of the "open access" powers granted in the 1992 Energy Policy Act, passed in the first Bush Administration. That law undermined the power of local authorities and regional utility companies for the benefit of Enron. In 1999, Enron had defined "open access" as the company's "single-most important initiative."
Two years later, George W. delivered. Fortunately this subversion of the political process had a short life because Enron went belly up before Bush could save the company from itself.
Smart
01-23-2002, 04:04 AM
dude... toe the line, be a company man...
the new spin is that Babs Bush owned Enron stock which she bought at a dollar or so and sold at 43 cents... so, the Bush's are victims too... WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!
~KRYLON2~
01-23-2002, 04:04 AM
this whole stock market thing is bullshit.....FUCK THE GOVERMENT
uh and yes
01-23-2002, 04:58 AM
krylon2, at least back up your opinion.
basically, enron helped bush. bush fucked enron.
my dad worked for enron for 25 years. i was in a bar the other night with my mom, and as we were walking to the car she was crying and said "now, ken lay (enron CEO) has all our fucking money." it was pretty funny. enron has done some kind of shady things in their rise to the top. and, for that i have never liked them, but they did put food on my table for a long time. go greed go!
Big Bruno
01-23-2002, 05:02 AM
your mom was crying because she is financially distressed and it funny?
TEARZ
01-23-2002, 05:55 AM
B&G-
bush didn't fuck enron... read that nation shit in my first post. enron executives fucked themselves. the whole thing was a fucking sham. the bushes were helping out enron for years.
i'm sorry that the whole thing affected your family. i think that's fucked up. enron execs effectively sold families like yours out.
Cracked Ass
01-23-2002, 06:25 AM
Corporations suck, but I have to question the naivete of the employees, who should know full well by now that corporations suck. They have no loyalty whatsoever. So why do employees trust the top brass with their life savings and future? The same shit happened at Polaroid.
Nobody gives a shit about what happens to your money more than YOU do. Educate yourself a little bit and manage your own money. It's not that hard. What's best for CEOs and Wall Street brokers is precisely what's worst for you, so tell them all to go to hell.
sectorTVA
01-23-2002, 06:33 AM
i play it safe and invest in mutual funds.....i got my ira set up already so when i retire when im 60 ill have enough money to keep me living comfortably....on a side note, kmart filied chapter 11 bankrupcy....
seeking
01-23-2002, 08:57 AM
i keep a wide array of both large and small arms, as well as enough ammo to last me till samsara... that has nothing to do with enron, but fuck a corporation.
think of it like this.
if you get a pager from the corner store with a one year contract, and you terminate it early, you have to pay a cancelation fee.
if the corner store stops selling and servicing pagers, you're fucked.
thats how big business works. you can never, ever win.
except i can, cause im just not paying the credit card companies anything. i'll show them! :o
Unregistered
01-23-2002, 12:07 PM
Originally posted by Cracked Ass
What's best for CEOs and Wall Street brokers is precisely what's worst for you, so tell them all to go to hell.
Yes, and start an underground fighting group to relinquish your lack of feeling on your fellow, smothered-in-some-negative-way-by-society peers through rigorous, painful beatings which will ultimately free your caged inner self.
Wait, that was Fight Club ... nevermind.
uh and yes
01-23-2002, 11:10 PM
yeah, it sucks... my dad gave his life for that company. and, because of that, wasnt around too much when i was a kid. my family will be ok. my mom may not get all the nic-naks she wants. but, they will survive. my mom's hatred for ken lay is funny. and, the fact that my parents are learning that money isnt everything so late in life is interesting. in the past year, between sysco and enron, my parents have lost a small fortune, but they will cope.
enron gave a shitload to bush's campaign in hopes of bush helping them out with legislation (which is not something that i condone... read above: i am not a big fan of enron to begin with), but, their loyalty (which is admirable) was all for not, when bush didnt help them out. so, bush got into the situation when it was profitable for him, and then was ready to fuck them in the ass, when all was said and done. quit listening to your parents views, and create your own.
seeking
01-23-2002, 11:14 PM
i cant remember what i was watching last night, but they were discussing this, and discussing how infact bush didnt fuck them in the ass, they just fucked themselfs up so badly that there was nothing bush could possibly do to help them at that point. i'll try and find the source and repost it.
this enron shit has been interesting to me, because i knew absolutely nothing about it, until it was already fodder for late night monologues. so now im trying to play catch up, yet at the same time, i really dont give a shit cause i know it will happen a million times this year on varying scales...
when i stop posting and you find out ive moved to a monastarie in thialand, dont be suprised.
uh and yes
01-23-2002, 11:20 PM
you say this will happen a million times... which, it will, but i dont think people realize the magnitude of this. enron, at one point last year, was the 6th largest company in america. this is definitely a situation that demands attention.
seeking
01-23-2002, 11:22 PM
oh, no, i agree, this is a huge deal... my point was simply to say that no matter how much i know, what can i stop? i know thats a very defeatest attitude, but i am only me, and even if there were a million of me, big business just squashes anything they disagree with. i just hate the world. im gonna go get in the shower now.
TEARZ
01-24-2002, 06:43 AM
no offense dude, you're just wrong. and chill with that "get your own views that aren't your parents." that's herb shit and you don't even know the half of who you might be talking to. seeking and i (as well as cracked) are well older than you and are no longer actively receiving current events perspectives from parents. we've all shown the ability to intelligently converse on this forum for a minute now. and plus, since you're just wrong, it makes you sound worse.
seeking is right, just as i was right in my previous posts. BUSH WAS GOING TO HELP ENRON. PLEASE READ MY FIRST POST AGAIN- IT EXPLAINS THIS. yes, enron gave tons to bush and he was in the process of creating legislation that would be gold for them (again check out the italics in the first post). enron was so poorly managed (and such a fraud) that it did not last long enough to reap the benefits of the energy legislation that bush & co was about to push.
uh and yes
01-24-2002, 06:47 AM
Originally posted by TEARZ
you don't even know the half of who you might be talking to. seeking and i (as well as cracked) are well older than you.
i dont know who i am talking to... but, you some how now my age? real classy...
i agree both parties fucked up... but, enron didnt just hurt themselves here. believe me i am almost as anti-enron as i am anti-bush... well, no, not even close... but, i am not a fan of either.
TEARZ
01-24-2002, 06:59 AM
look man, i'm not trying to start a shit flinging fest with you. i'd like to know your perspective, but based on what you're saying i can't believe that you 1. read what was first posted from the nation or 2. are informed entirely of what's going on. it's not a bush vs. enron thing. you can hate bush AND hate enron. i do both. it's a bush AND enron corruption thing. i can see how from you're familial perspective that you think that bush fucked enron, but that's just not true. he (and especially his family) helped build them from the start. in 94 he pressured the argentinian government to give enron a national pipeline deal down there (just as an example). what's the ideal situation for you? what would you have liked to see happen? i mean obviously you don't want you're family to lose money (and i am by no means making light of this at all), but did you really want dubya to pass corrupt ass legislation that would benefit enron in the short term? because that's all it would be. short term. enron was bullshit. it was going to fall apart eventually NO MATTER WHAT. if bush did everything in his power to sustain enron (and there is evidence that he did), it would buy the company at most a few more years. the bullshit faulty accounting was going to bite them in the ass at some point.
Cracked Ass
01-24-2002, 07:13 AM
Whoever said mutual funds were "safe" is fucking dreaming. The brokers are running as big a scam as Enron, and that house of cards is not far from toppling.
What's in a mutual fund? Stocks like Enron, Kmart, Polaroid...oops!!
uh and yes
01-24-2002, 07:19 AM
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by TEARZ
you don't even know the half of who you might be talking to. seeking and i (as well as cracked) are well older than you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
are you going to refute this at all!?!?!??!?!
Originally posted by TEARZ
read what was first posted from the nation or
i think you are putting a little too much confidence in the media by focusing on this nation article...
Originally posted by TEARZ
it's a bush AND enron corruption thing.
i never said it wasnt
Originally posted by TEARZ
familial
uhhhhhhhhhhhh... next quote.
Originally posted by TEARZ
he (and especially his family) helped build them from the start. in 94 he pressured the argentinian government to give enron a national pipeline deal down there
hm, ok, so your first chronological example of him building a 25 year old company comes from 1994... i will let you do the math. and, the bush family may have furthered enron's rise in texas... but, enron actually had a lot of strong ties and was built from a country called Natural Clean Fuels (based in omaha nebraska), but they may have left that out of your nation report... it looks as if my life long involvement with the company seemed to inform me better than your 3 page nation blurb. and, will you fucking realize i am not sticking up for enron.
Originally posted by TEARZ
enron was bullshit.
enron was the 6th largest country in the nation last year... you complain about me not reading your posts!? pasheesh!
enron fucked up big time, no doubt! but, it was convenient that bush got his part of the deal before enron fell out of power... who knows? bush may have passed state legislation for enron to stay "afloat" for a few more years just so they would be around to help his campaign.
TEARZ
01-24-2002, 07:31 AM
why bother?
you win buddy. you "refuted" me.
uh and yes
01-24-2002, 07:34 AM
BOOYAH! i am printing and framing that!
just kidding, i only have opinions. what the media says will never be fact to me. and, you said you were interested in hearing what i thought, well, i broke down what you said, and addressed it thoroughly... sorry, i was trying to debate. but, whatever. it is just opinions. no harm, no foul. nothing personal.
TEARZ
01-24-2002, 08:08 AM
honestly dude, you didn't break down shit. i could cite hundreds of articles and government documents that detail the relationship between the bush family and enron, but since nothing the media says is fact to you, i guess it wouldn't mean shit. i gave you an example from 94- that was one of dubya's first favors to enron. i could cite shit back to the 70s, but again it wouldn't mean shit to you. hahaha, putting confidence in the media by reading the nation...right.
and when i say enron was bullshit, it was. it was bullshit that they were the 6th largest company in america last year. they were on paper, but they lied about their assets and concealed their massive debts thanks to their complicit accountants from arthur anderson. enron was a fraud as a whole. that's widely understood. that's my point. it's that fraud and mismanagement that brought them down, not bush. and i don't think you're defending enron.
and those enron execs that supported bush will still support him. he went the extra mile for them, and that's what you don't get. the execs know that, and i'm sure they'll hook him up lovely. i don't need to remind you that they weren't the ones that took a loss in this whole thing.
will a rational person please give me some back-up?
jeezus this is getting tedious.
the enron scandal is a nightmare..it is funny how a government which supposedly does not like to intervene in business matters...a laisez-faire attitude, has so many ties to the implosion of what was supposedly the 7th largest complany in the world..
the heads of the company knew it was in trouble and enlisted the government to try and help..thank you so much, Bush, for the deregulation of energy!! fuck! has this actually helped anylone? i saw recently that only 2.9 percent of utility buyers are actually able to choose an electricity provider..and look at deregulation in california...blackouts..
so it goes to show that the government stood to gain, the enron execs stood to gain, and the public was left to clean up the mess..
it is so funny what tina fey said on SNL..the republican scandals are far worse than what we've seen from the democrats recently, but they are so boring and hard to understand no one pays any attention..
CRACKED...i have to respond..the employees may have been naive..but lets not forget...people build 401k's based on reported earnings..enron lied about their earnings for 6 years..those people thought the company was doing well..since it is illegal to falsify that information...many 401k plans match employee contributions with company stock or funds.. so it can be difficult to properly diversify..then, when it was apparent the company was going under, employees were prohibited from selling their shares!! they could not dump the shit even when they knew they were losing everything..the corp heads knew what was up, and sold everything they had in the meantime..when they were done, there was nothing left for the employees..i hardly think that can be considered naivitee..they were misled by years of documents, that have now been shredded..let's face it, when a company is rated a certain way in the financial world, such as 7th lgst, we believe it because lying about that shit is illegal..i truly feel sorry for those people ..they got conned..
imported_bobobi11
01-24-2002, 05:24 PM
This is an interesting article that was printed in one of our local papers. It tends to be a little more independent and doesn't just rehash the same old lines. We were affected by the Enron scandal here in Portland since they purchased our main electrical utility. This is a huge hot topic here. But anyway this article is interesting in realizing how far the payoffs went.
The Nose
Rancid leftovers from Enron's trough.
BY THE NOSE
243-2122
The Nose swears on his mother's grave that he hasn't been tainted by the Enron scandal. No cash, no fruit basket, no holiday cards from Kenny-boy.
It's a bold statement to make because it appears everyone else was befriended by the now-bankrupt energy company. In Oregon alone, the line of those who got gifts from Enron is longer than the Sunday-morning wait for a table at the Original Pancake House on Barbur Boulevard.
Elected officials, of course, top the list. The boys from Texas proved looser with their wallets than a sailor at the Dancin' Bare, tossing wads of cash without regard to sex, race or party affiliation. In 2000 alone, $68,000 of Enron-related cash made its way to more than 80 candidates for the Oregon Legislature. And over the past few years, every single member of Oregon's congressional delegation has received Enron-related dough: Peter Defazio ($1,750), Darlene Hooley ($1,950), David Wu ($2,250), Greg Walden ($3,500), Ron Wyden ($4,000) Earl Blumenauer ($8,500) and Gordon Smith ($18,000). Smith's take was particularly embarrassing--he received more Enron cash than all but six members of the U.S Senate.
As the Enron hearings drag on up on the Hill, it will become clear how difficult it is to pin the quid to the quo of this donkey. For example, two years ago Wu and Hooley voted for one of many Enron-helpers that passed Congress--an amendment to the Commodity Exchange Act that exempted Enron from regulatory scrutiny. Was this a bit of political payback, or simply support for a larger appropriations bill?
It's not just elected officials who sidled up to the Enron oil-based buffet. When the company was wooing Portland General Electric, it offered a number of key employees windfalls if they were able to help smooth the purchase past the recalcitrant Oregon Public Utility Commission.
They did, and Enron made good: In the year 2000, PGE CEO Ken Harrison and treasurer Joseph Hirko cashed in their Enron stock options. Harrison walked away with $75 million. Hirko cleared a mere $35 million. A number of other PGE execs, including Peggy Fowler, Fred Miller, Don Kielblock, Alvin Alexanderson and Richard Dyer, received stock and options that, depending on when and if they were exercised, were worth in excess of $1 million for each.
Even the tofu crowd helped itself to the Enron smorgasbord. In February 1997, a coalition of environmental groups endorsed Enron's purchase of PGE. In return, Enron awarded them grants totaling $500,000, including $30,000 given to Northwest Environmental Advocates, $15,000 to Salmon Watch and $5,000 to American Rivers. The trail of cashed checks even leads to the door of the Citizens' Utility Board, which received $227,000 in 2000 for dropping a lawsuit and backing off its campaign for a statewide referendum on the closed Trojan nuclear power plant that would have cost Enron $300 million.
Would the Nose have liked a piece of this action? You bet. But now that the Enron collapse is the biggest scandal since the savings-and-loan crisis, the Beak will gladly take the high road.
What's scary about this is not that all these folks took money from a company that distorted the public process in the name of obscene--and ultimately, unsupportable--profits. What's scary is that if the boys from Texas hadn't been so gluttonous, they might just have pulled it off--and none of these folks would be looking at their old deposit slips with such embarrassment.
TEARZ
01-25-2002, 06:09 PM
boom.
beardo
01-25-2002, 06:33 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/01/25/enron.sui...cide/index.html (http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/01/25/enron.suicide/index.html)
Former Enron executive dies in apparent suicide
SUGARLAND, Texas (CNN) -- The former vice chairman of Enron Corp. was found dead Friday, the victim of an apparent suicide, police in Sugarland, Texas, said.
John C. Baxter was found dead at 2:23 a.m., said Pat Whitte of the Sugarland Police.
"He was discovered inside a vehicle parked between two medians. A suicide note was found at the scene," Whitte said. "There was no sign of foul play. Inside his wallet was an ID indicating he was an employee of Enron."
The energy giant Enron Corp. has collapsed in the biggest bankruptcy filing in U.S. history, amid accusations of mishandling of funds and shredding of crucial documents. Enron and its accounting firm, Andersen LLP, are under congressional investigation.
The contents of the suicide note were not disclosed. Whitte did not say how Baxter died.
Baxter resigned in May of last year. At the time he was 42 years old. He joined Enron in 1991 and was chairman and CEO of Enron North America before being named chief strategy officer for Enron in June 2000 and vice chairman in October 2000.
He had remained as an Enron consultant.
A former vice president at Enron, Sherron Watkins, wrote to former Enron Chairman Kenneth Lay saying Baxter had been unhappy about Enron's dealings with one of its limited partnerships.
"Cliff Baxter complained mightily to (Enron CEO Jeff) Skilling and all who would listen about the inappropriateness of our transactions with LJM," the limited partnership.
Enron said in a statement that: "We are deeply saddened by the tragic loss of our friend and colleague Cliff Baxter. Our thoughts and prayers go out to his family and friends."
iCEBERG
01-25-2002, 06:38 PM
the power of the dollar.
tearz..
well, looks like you and i are about the only ones who give a flying fuck...that motherfucker just killed himself.
can you believe this!??!
35 million dollars and he kills himself..what did this guy know?
about bush? cheney?
he must have been in really fucking deep...goes out for a drive, shoots himself in his car..my mind is blown..but i guess i'm really not that surprised..although they probably wouldn't spend that much time in jail, maybe they realized the injustices they pulled on thousands of innocent people and took a guilt trip into the great beyond...
this goes far beyond the enron board room and sinks into nearly every facet of out government..republican, democrat, independent interests..somehow all these people are involved and to blame..
i wonder if some of the other execs will take a cue from this moron..i saw some of the accounting firm people refusing to testify at the senate committee investigating this debacle..
beardo...check the enron thread
this is gonna keep getting deeper.
beardo
01-25-2002, 07:56 PM
ah, good call. i'll just join this one up with that thread.
Sonik3000
01-25-2002, 07:56 PM
A couple notes:
blood n guts: your family probably took a bath on Cisco, not Sysco. Cisco is the the internet router company that has taken a beating, Sysco is a foodservice distribution company that has actually done quite well in the past year. Luckily, I got in and recouped some of the lost value of the other Cisco, which I will hold. Like millions, I took a bath on Enron. The remainder of my hand will remain hidden, good and bad.
are2: Tina Fey, incidentally, is in my dreams rather frequently, even as I sit minutes from Copacabana Beach, as I do now. Since you lost it before, also, my email is calebfunk@hotmail.com
God Bless America.
Sonik3000
tina fey is hilarious..that scar she has is kinda sexy...
Sonik3000
01-25-2002, 08:02 PM
Wow.... just killed himself... something tells me he wont be the only one who ends up dead at any hand... ken lay owes waaaaaaay too many people and explanation, huh......
Sonik3000
01-25-2002, 08:03 PM
You aint kidding..... I wanna lick that scar.
beardo
01-25-2002, 08:42 PM
glad im not the only one who thinks shes cute.
Cracked Ass
01-25-2002, 10:07 PM
How do we know it was suicide? I doubt a guy with $35 million is going to knock himself off over a guilt trip. It says he had complained to other top management about some of Enron's dealings. So maybe some other top management perceived a threat from his loose lips now that the investigations are underway.
Or, he knows how bad it REALLY is, and everybody else is in for longer prison terms than we thought.
-------------------
Are2: My feelings about "naivete" are really closer to halfway between what I first said, and what you said you felt. I just think a lot of the American public - not so much those particular Enron employees - are too trusting in general of corporations, mutual funds, 401Ks which are over-invested in the markets, Wall Street, Bush, Greenspan, and are generally uneducated about money and how to handle it. I'm kind of a strange voice on the issue of money, because I know how I would handle my money if I had any, but I'm too lazy to work so I don't have any.
it's funny..only after talking to a friend about the enron exec did i realize maybe it wasn't suicide..of course! that makes so much sense...that guy had millions..and who knows how much in information..
this whole thing makes lewinsky look like, well, a stain on a dress..
and yes cracked, people are way to trusting of bush, and the western world's demigod, alan greenspan
willy.wonka
01-25-2002, 10:44 PM
Some guy was gonna talk,thats all i know...then he killed himself....or was it bush's merry men????????
TEARZ
01-26-2002, 06:13 PM
wow, my mind is completely blown.
i was traveling all day on friday and i didn't hear of this til now.
good looking out people.
it's getting deeper for real. holy shit.
uh and yes
01-26-2002, 09:24 PM
Originally posted by Sonik3000
blood n guts: your family probably took a bath on Cisco, not Sysco. Cisco is the the internet router company that has taken a beating, Sysco is a foodservice distribution company that has actually done quite well in the past year. Luckily, I got in and recouped some of the lost value of the other Cisco, which I will hold. Like millions, I took a bath on Enron. The remainder of my hand will remain hidden, good and bad.
actually, i meant sysqo... after the rise of "the thong song," my parents invested heavily in this r&b/rap sensation. his inability to consistently produce hits are making my parents really wish they had opted for nelly...
take a ride with me.
dukeofyork
01-26-2002, 09:42 PM
Originally posted by blood & guts
actually, i meant sysqo... after the rise of "the thong song," my parents invested heavily in this r&b/rap sensation. his inability to consistently produce hits are making my parents really wish they had opted for nelly...
take a ride with me.
ha ha...
ill just leave my comments at that.
im not witty
01-27-2002, 03:50 AM
check out www.mnfsiu.cc (http://www.mnfsiu.cc)
for enron humor!
my new fighting style is unstopable!
BROWNer
01-28-2002, 08:18 AM
this needs a scandalous bump...
some interesting tidbits on baxter that i'm sure you've already heard:
"Though believed to be one of the "whistle blowers" on Enron's financial mismanagement - last August a senior employee warned executives that Baxter was "telling anyone who would listen" about the "inappropriateness of our transaction" - his reaction to colleagues who congratulated him on his moral stance was, at times, bizarre.
"When I told him, two days ago, that he had done a good thing, he broke down in tears and said something about how he might need a bodyguard," said one friend."
hmm...
i find it immensely amusing that the bush administration is keeping the names of
those apart of the energy plan a secret. this is something bush has been hiding
since election.
bush is a sinister motherfucker.
Originally posted by BROWNer
this needs a scandalous bump...
bush is a sinister motherfucker.
...word
are some people just now realizing this?!
boxcarwilly
01-28-2002, 04:36 PM
this bothers me mildly, that most are in consensus if not agreement that enron is some sort of coverup/hoax anything. i personally believe it is to take media attention off warcrimes etc.
but what bothers me is that bullshit enron has caught more attention than my post on the wef. the world economic forum is bigger and badder than any scam the government could shove down our already bullshit lined throats. nyc will most likely end up worse than seattle did and probably along the same lines as genoa usually does when globalization sets its club foot in a major city.
just my thoughts and no i dont want a fucking penny for them. i want all the anticapitalist/antiglob people who hide on this site to be in nyc next week throwing molotov cocktails at bill gates' limo. or be down there painting i dont give a shit. just fuck the machine. i know i sound 17 and have just listened to a rage album but that isnt it.
i have just been reading a lot of ammon hennacy, and dylan thomas.
im not witty
01-28-2002, 06:24 PM
willy id be there if i could.
but im trying to hold it down here in the dirty south.
the revolution will be internalized!
i agree that globalization is a problem..however, the people who are protesting i do not agree with..there are lots of things about modern technology that are very beneficial, especially to the 3d world..and most anti glob protesters are against this stuff..such as genetically engineered crops, foods, vaccines, and animals...and these protesters are against all this..
if these protesters could actually organize something constructive to make a difference, rather than throwing molotov cocktails, maybe we could do something about these problems..
what happened in genoa was due in large part to these radical protesters, who are more about destruction than construction..they don't want a solution..they just want things to go back to the stone ages..most antiglob protesters participating in these demonstrations aren't interested in productive protesting..that is why that kid got killed by a cop..many moderate protesters aren't even interested in attending these conferences anymore because "hooligans" have taken over..
newsweek has had a few great articles about this...
and by the way, if you think the republicans devised enron to take heat off the war, sorry, but you are a fucking moron.
enron was happening years ago..it is only now that it is coming to light...why? because the government has been helping to try and keep it quiet..it's only after millions lost their fortunes that word got out..
and now people are gettin offed...
this scandal is far worse than boxcar understands
boxcarwilly
01-28-2002, 09:48 PM
i dont think that enron blew up for that sole reason i just happen to think it is really bad timing.
as most anti glob kids i understand that technology is existant and allpervasive in fact i use my comp almost every day and probably wouldnt know what to do without it. but i do feel in my heart that globalization is a bad scene, i am guilty of using multinationalconglomerates on a daily basis to satisfy some selfish inhuman urge, but i recognize the dangers and addictions that stem forth from such urges, this would lead me to the naturalist party line, nature will win regardless, the point is to make it less lethal.
and in order to do this the globmovement must be condemned, capitalism must be destroyed, and people need to start working together, COMUNALLY. no masters.
and to prove my point about capitalism this SCANDAL is only a direct result of globalization and capitalism. greed and hate and all that jazz.
about the little stab about "radicalism" no change in the history of the world has every taken place by "peaceful" protest or organization, i have a lot of allies under the christian anarchy label and our main difference is that i fully believe violence changes things... malcolm x caused civil rights change not mlk, gandhi didnt do jack it was the thousands of chowkidars and indian nationalist freedom fighters that helped removed the brits from india... and to bring it to the US direct action is all that has built a nation, when it was somewhat liveable, need i mention Boston Tea Party, but you all knew that right?
i dont want to be the only one here waving my little black flag but there are anarchists everywhere.
beardo
01-28-2002, 11:15 PM
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20020128/t...nron_dc_50.html (http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20020128/ts/enron_dc_50.html)
BROWNer
01-28-2002, 11:53 PM
messy biz.
TEARZ
01-29-2002, 02:31 AM
browner's back in town. love it.
scandalous bump indeed. i gotta catch up. been traveling.
jobe- i don't understand why enron would be a bad thing at all. faith in capitalism and big business is potentially at an all time low for this decade. look at it that way- recession + filthy disgusting scandal= opportunity for you and your comrades. see it as a blessing dog.
boxcarwilly
01-29-2002, 03:32 AM
i like to think enron is a goodtool in terms of displaying the wrongs of capitalism.
thanks for the comrade stab... im not a communist...i repeat....not a communist...
TEARZ
01-29-2002, 04:13 AM
wasn't a stab homey. take it easy. bad word choice.
boxcar..
i do feel that i am a responsible consumer..i have tried to folow in the staps of some active minded folks who think that corporations are getting out of control..i also think that the so-called president we've got now is all about the interests of big business..not about the people at all.
there are definitely some huge dangers lurking in capitalism..i am not ardently opposed to it..i think most americans have it pretty good..and it can be very easy to condemn the system while living peacefully within it...however, it is very important to be suspicious, and to question our world leaders in what is today a global village..
i am not interested in fighting globalization, but rather, making it more productive and positive for the globe, and not just corporations..i do believe that..on some level, this may be possible...international cooperation is going to be vital in the upcoming centuries..natural resources, like water, are going to start running out, soon, and we may end up needing some allies..
i do think that nafta and some other recent trade pacts are pretty damaging to most people..however, i don't see how rioting is going to help bring these fuckers down from their perches..
i disagree with some of your points about nonviolent protest..to say that ghandi did not do shit is really giving yourself a lot of historical liberties...
violence as a solution opens the doors for everyone else to use the same means..we are all judged by the same standards..so, anyone who wants to change things does so violenly? tell that to Musharraf, current president of pakistan, who staged a bloodless coup.
violent christian anarchists? now that is a group of people i would be suspicious of..
i'm not into anarchy..humanity as a whole is an irresponsible, uneducated lot..let's get them some good schools before we give them total self determination..
and p.s. boxcar, that newsweek article quoted an anarchist group (sorry, i don't know the name right now) as saying that what was going on in genoa was so out of control, they did not support those protesters..
i love the political discussions..this is america, we all have a right to our opinions, and i respect the dissenters..
boxcarwilly
01-29-2002, 10:36 PM
are2 thanks for your little vote of support, and that was in all seriousness. i dont want to start a global battlefield here, but i do want to clear things up.
christian anarchy:
this is what i said "I have a lot of allies under the christian anarchy label and our main difference is that I fully believe violence changes things"
i should clarify as i am not a christian anarchist. a lot of myfriends are though and believe in nonviolence. i personally define violence as direct physical harm caused to humans. does this mean i disagree with violence no, but there is direct action that doesnt phsically hurt people...
"...international cooperation is going to be vital in the upcoming centuries..natural resources, like water, are going to start running out, soon, and we may end up needing some allies.. "
and what is the reason for this... this is a supply problem that comes from the demands of a ghaslty consumer industry, in a true communalist society only what is needed is produced and used,inour overconsumptive society everything is wasted, by CORPORATIONS.
i could go on, but i have to get stuff ready for this weekend... ill tellyou allhow it went but youll see the news.
uh and yes
01-29-2002, 10:46 PM
Originally posted by blood & guts
actually, i meant sysqo... after the rise of "the thong song," my parents invested heavily in this r&b/rap sensation. his inability to consistently produce hits are making my parents really wish they had opted for nelly...
take a ride with me.
i thought this was funny, and i dont think it got enough credit.
imported_alkaline
01-29-2002, 10:58 PM
Diagnosis: Hilarious!
I thought it was funny too.
juggernaut
01-30-2002, 09:52 PM
you people who care need to subscribe to The Nation and The Progressive. awesome magazines.
those of you going by the McMedia need to cut it with some real reporting.
i was just readin gmore about the guy who killed himself..
excellent home life, loving family..just bought his mom a new caddy for her bday and took the family to ireland to celebrate, was waiting on delivery of his new yacht..he was on the "right" side of enron, and although he new the accounting was shady, he resigned from the company a while ago for those reasons..
his family doesn't understand..it seems they don't think he would kill himself..
and yes, the nation is a good newsmagazine..but i don't subscribe..
boxcarwilly
01-30-2002, 10:40 PM
www.infoshop.org (http://www.infoshop.org)
where the real news goes.
juggernaut
01-31-2002, 12:42 AM
i can't wait to hear all the news that's going to surface about this "suicide".
of course, it'll never be aired prime-time or anything.. it's a shame, too because "joe public" now is looking at it as guilt. i'm leaning more torwards murder.
TEARZ
07-04-2002, 07:49 AM
yes.... what ever came of this "investigation?"
peep this link.
http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/07/03/...tock/index.html (http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/07/03/bush.stock/index.html)
republicans have no shame, bruh. dudes are trying to act like they are cracking down on corporate corruption when they are its primary benificiaries. i'd love to give those fucks some shutos to their larynxes.
the nation is key. please believe i'm a subscriber.
ctrl+alt+del
07-04-2002, 08:24 AM
its not just Bush jr, you know Bush Sr is the one in control. Hes the one who got his son chosen to be the pretender in chief. shits sheisty.
TEARZ
07-04-2002, 08:45 AM
i've reviewed this thread in its entirety and i have a few notes...
1. are2 had some nice points and some nuanced commentary. hope you'll continue to enter the fray.
2. i'm interested in how cracked ass would invest his $ if he had any.
3. a few of you have noted that you own stocks/mutual funds. as do i. what's your thinking and approach to investing and how do you know what you're doing? where does morality come into play in investing?
ok, first of all, for me, i grew up poor- a fact that informs many of my decisions, but it becomes all the more influential when it comes to dough.
when i was 20, i decided that even though i was not down with greed, capitalism and exploitation, i should invest and "play the game" rather than get played. instead of spending all my dough on bullshit like my friends- clothes, cars, weed and records, i decided that i'd set aside a fraction of my income and when i came into a little lump sum i opened up a roth ira through the internet. i researched funds by myself, started reading the economist and the wall street journal, did online reserach and talked to any old rich people that would talk to me. so i bought a small cap growth mutual fund because i'm a gambler and it has mostly paid off.
my outlook at the time was (and to some extent still is) fuck responsible investing- i do a lot for the world already, and i'm trying to get paid... of course i wouldn't ever invest in a fund that held something blatant like philip morris or nike, but outside of that i was not that discriminate. but for the most part, it was mostly a non-issue because i was investing in small cap tech stocks which, as a whole, have a socially responsible track record.
now, i work for a grassroots non profit and i am still doing laregely save the world type shit, but i have also recently bought a socially responsible mutual fund (as well as some value stocks)... the fund has skyrocketed recently.
of course i largely agree with crack's idea of DIY investing and money management... but you really have to do your homework to know if something major happens in one of your funds- a collapse in a top 10 holding, or the switch of a fund manager, nevermind having to deal with corporations lying about their profits and losses. luckily, some funds are starting to play the watchdog a little more, insisting that companies get separate auditors and consulting firms to avoid conflicts of interest, or else they threaten to sell out.
i guess i just wanted to use this as a place to discuss the market and investing philosophies... it seems hard sometimes to maintain personal integrity and still "play the game," but it has to be done if people with revolutionary ideas want the ability to fund their own projects without lifelong debt or the comprimise of their idea(l)...
what do you think?
TEARZ
07-05-2002, 05:43 AM
no one hears my prayer... :(
TEARZ
07-09-2002, 05:04 AM
let me clear my throat....
BROWNer
07-11-2002, 04:56 AM
bajeezus!!!
this needs another scandalous boink...
um....
sadly i have zero inp[ut] as i'm
on 'borrowed time'. which sucks quite heavily.
anyhow......
hi tearz.
bye tearz.
maybe when i get
a better account ii'l pop in for some
delineatory confabulationsz..
.
now back to my harpers article 'the case against
henry(scum assoholic) kissinger'.
BROWNer
07-11-2002, 05:01 AM
oh.....yea...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/ame...000/2119981.stm (http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_2119000/2119981.stm)
TEARZ
07-17-2002, 01:00 AM
hi browner... good to see you man. thanks for the bump. i'd like to hear some in depth twinkified analysis at some point. i must say that besides the occasional good thing and the bike thread, 12oz has bunted lately. so i haven't really been checking... pretty sure you're on the same page... you and tesser were stirring up the pot for a while, but it's hard when you're dealing with 90% dorkass boner boys.
fuck an enron. fuck a worldcom.
take care brah.
BROWNer
07-17-2002, 01:56 AM
hey nerd!
first off: investments....
i can't offer anything on investments or anything
to do with money, becuz i don't have ANY, and i haven't
for most of my adult life so far. well....i have, but i've never
put it into anything like that. the stock market and banking
are a mystery to me. one of these days i'll get interested..
on a side note, i had to get one blank cheque made up at my
bank last week, and when i went in it cost me fucking 50cents! i couldn't
believe it. i rambled to everyone in sight for the next 2 days and
everyone was like, 'yea, so what? thats normal'.................
i was mega fucking pissed..thats just a blatant scam if you ask me.
i don't get banking. what good does it do me? at this point, the margin
of benefits is actually negative.
its safe, and reliable, but other than that its just my money sitting
in their machines making THEM money. once the charges come
through the whole idea of having it sit there and gain interest is flushed.
and enron: i have no idea what is happening with that now.
is anything happening? seems to me its just tied up in the
bullshit of endless litigation. worldcom too. corporate crooks run shit.
the only thing i've seen lately is all the stuff with bush and
his harken stock. and i haven't read enough to make any
informed comments.........except that i don't trust what he says.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.