THE WRITERS FORUM - THE GRAFFITI DESTINATION

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
(#51
the.crooked
Premium Member
the.crooked is the motherfuckin' champ! the.crooked is the motherfuckin' champ! the.crooked is the motherfuckin' champ! the.crooked is the motherfuckin' champ! the.crooked is the motherfuckin' champ! the.crooked is the motherfuckin' champ! the.crooked is the motherfuckin' champ! the.crooked is the motherfuckin' champ! the.crooked is the motherfuckin' champ! the.crooked is the motherfuckin' champ! the.crooked is the motherfuckin' champ!
 
Posts: 5,835
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: clutch city
Status: Offline
 
Default Re: Freewill / Determinism - 09-10-2012, 04:40 PM

I find the simulation argument as a modified vat in a brain. Not in that it's impossible, but that it's sort of meaningless. Just like discussing whether there is a "god" or not, it's a question that is sort of impossible to ask.

sure, if we live in a simulation, so what? What does it change? What access to "reality" does it change?

invariably, the answer to those questions, is nothing.




all of them lost souls, and i'm their jesus
Reply With Quote
Unread
Official
12ozPROPHET SHOP MAKING OTHER SHOPS LOOK STUPID! 12ozPROPHET SHOP MAKING OTHER SHOPS LOOK STUPID! 12ozPROPHET SHOP MAKING OTHER SHOPS LOOK STUPID! 12ozPROPHET SHOP MAKING OTHER SHOPS LOOK STUPID! 12ozPROPHET SHOP MAKING OTHER SHOPS LOOK STUPID! 12ozPROPHET SHOP MAKING OTHER SHOPS LOOK STUPID! 12ozPROPHET SHOP MAKING OTHER SHOPS LOOK STUPID! 12ozPROPHET SHOP MAKING OTHER SHOPS LOOK STUPID! 12ozPROPHET SHOP MAKING OTHER SHOPS LOOK STUPID! 12ozPROPHET SHOP MAKING OTHER SHOPS LOOK STUPID! 12ozPROPHET SHOP MAKING OTHER SHOPS LOOK STUPID! 12ozPROPHET SHOP MAKING OTHER SHOPS LOOK STUPID!
 
Posts: 1,000,001
Since: 1993
Status: Open 24/7/365
 
Default The Real Deal Since 1993™

Old
(#52
vanfullofretards
Elite Member
vanfullofretards is the motherfuckin' champ! vanfullofretards is the motherfuckin' champ! vanfullofretards is the motherfuckin' champ! vanfullofretards is the motherfuckin' champ! vanfullofretards is the motherfuckin' champ! vanfullofretards is the motherfuckin' champ! vanfullofretards is the motherfuckin' champ! vanfullofretards is the motherfuckin' champ! vanfullofretards is the motherfuckin' champ! vanfullofretards is the motherfuckin' champ! vanfullofretards is the motherfuckin' champ!
 
Posts: 4,533
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status: Offline
 
Default Re: Freewill / Determinism - 09-10-2012, 07:39 PM

If scientists (physicists and the like) prove this is a simulation, do you still think that wouldn't change anything? Would you still say "so what?"? Wouldn't the implications of such a truth drastically change human civilization? It's easy to say "No, no one would believe it or care" (or whatever) ... but I don't think that is necessarily true.


The coolest/creepiest thing I've read about this argument came from that VICE interview with Rich Terrile. It gives the reader a sense of the potentiality of this...

Quote:
As scientists, we put physical processes into mathematical frameworks, or into an equation. The universe behaves in a very peculiar way because it follows mathematics. Einstein said, “The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it’s comprehensible.” The universe does not have to work that way. It does not have to be so easy to abbreviate that I can basically write down a few pages of equations that contain enough information to simulate it.




VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
Reply With Quote
Old
(#53
dignan
Member
dignan is the motherfuckin' champ! dignan is the motherfuckin' champ! dignan is the motherfuckin' champ! dignan is the motherfuckin' champ! dignan is the motherfuckin' champ! dignan is the motherfuckin' champ! dignan is the motherfuckin' champ! dignan is the motherfuckin' champ! dignan is the motherfuckin' champ! dignan is the motherfuckin' champ! dignan is the motherfuckin' champ!
 
Posts: 1,226
Join Date: Jun 2002
Status: Offline
 
Default Re: Freewill / Determinism - 09-10-2012, 11:18 PM

In the beginning of the last paragraph of that two page PDF you linked to, Bostrom writes:

"If we are in a simulation, could ever know for certain? If the simulators don’t want us to find out, we probably never will. But if they choose to reveal themselves, they could certainly do so."

So, I understand this as the author saying we (scientists, physicists and the like) can't prove this is a simulation from our end. Without that top-down revelation, I think the most we could get is an accidently true belief...which is short of knowledge (which may also depend on if we could agree on what knowledge would entail).


It's a fun thing to think about, and it makes me wish I knew more about Philosophy of Mind.
Reply With Quote
Reply


USERS CURRENTLY VIEWING THIS THREAD: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



12ozPROPHET.com Presents The Writers Forum.
Designed in NYC by ALSO KNOWN AS.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.